Taking two instances of learning from the own life experience – one you will call a ‘good' learning experience, one particular you would call a ‘bad' learning encounter – describe them and then clarify the differences inside the experiences with regards to theories regarding learning. Are you able to draw any kind of conclusions out of your reflection and reading regarding the nature of successful learning activities?
Educational psychiatrist Jean Piaget states that cognitive advancement and hence an individual's achievement with regards to learning is usually down to a combination of maturation and the environment. Learning is the process of psychological modifications in the brain resulting in which means and is based on the conversation between material and the interpersonal environment. you A range of explanations had been constructed by prominent figures to recommend theories pertaining to learning according to the importance of a teaching determine and the use of motivation, coding, memory space and intuition. They look in to the relationship between of environment and provide a chance to enhance ability to use both equally themselves and environment in effective approach. 2 Savoir influence has grown over the years ultimately causing a richer understanding of learning theories in the modern day; this has led to strong development in the educational system. 3 My personal essay will probably be considering these in regards to my personal experience whilst highlighting on them and discussing the nature of effective learning experiences.
A significant example of a strong learning experience was my trip to the Thackray medical art gallery. During period at university learning GCSE history – we made a journery to the treatments museum in Leeds to get insight and additional understanding of treatments through time. This was a very good experience in mastering as it resulted in the training course could become more active and looking for exhibitions like the backstreet of Leeds resulted in the topic transforms in a way that raises my interest as well as understanding. During the visit we gone around in groups and were given a directory of questions to response whilst we all observed the exhibitions in the museum. Concerns made the experience helpful mainly because it kept all of us focused on the subject whilst all of us explored the detail and also providing a kind of scaffolding to get learning (Vygotsky, 1934).
Examples similar to this are based on the constructivist way of learning – as the visit designed I could build upon pre-existing as I currently had some knowledge of public well-being and the changing medicine. 5 Psychologists just like Bruner (1961) believe this method to learning is effective as it means students are involved in own learning and therefore will preserve more information, it also ‘bridges the gap among classroom plus the real world. '5
Seeing the displays and stimuli such as the backside street inside the museum are helpful in the development of understanding as this is an efficient type of active learning. During this encounter we could step back in time to appreciate the period of record consequently info I learned on public health could be transferred to new situations specifically my GCSE test as well as figure out areas I want more information to get. 6 This experience was effective as it helped me to allow for new expertise and the magnitude of this knowledge being successful is gained by simply me getting an A* in my history GCSE exam.
A differing example of an experience I have acquired when learning was a lesson during my time in history A-Level. This case in point however is not a strong example and shows disadvantages in terms of styles of learning. The teachings consisted of my own teacher talking through the text publication then sending us aside to do job by ourself. Teaching in this style – suggests that individuals can learn and remember information concerning a certain part of history by simply being told details. Though the questions given to do independently can offer us a lot of level of understanding, educational specialists suggest that this does not constitute total meaning...
Bibliography: BIGGE, M., SHERMIS, H. 2004. Learning Theories to get Teachers (6th Edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
BRANSFORD, J. BROWN, A. BENDING, R. 2k. How People Learn. Wa: National Schools Press.
CLAXTON, G. 2002. Building Learning Power. Bristol: TLO Limited.
DANIELS, They would. 2005. Introduction to Vygotsky – Second Model. Sussex: Routledge.
FLEMING, In. [no date]. VARK: a guide to learning styles [online]. Available from: http://www.vark-learn.com
ILLERIS, T. 2002. The Three Dimensions of Learning. Contempory learning theory in the tension field involving the cognitive, the emotional plus the social. Denmark: Roskilde School Press.
KOLB, D. A. 1984. Trial and error Learning: Knowledge as the source Learning and Development. The state of michigan: Prentice-Hall.
SOTTO, E. 1994. When ever Teaching Turns into Learning. London, uk: Cassell.
STEAKLEY, M. Electronic. . Advantages, Drawbacks and Applications of Constructivism [online]. Available from: http://www.slideshare.net/mesteakley/advantages-disadvantages-and-applications-of-constructivism